Homepage
search
ProductsShopNewsSupportCompany
English
Products

Contact
SheerVideo
PhotoJazz
Synchromy

SheerVideo

Testimonials
Speed
Power
Fidelity
Versatility
FAQ
Test Data

FAQ

Introduction
Uses
Speed
Power
Fidelity
Formats
Availability

Fidelity

Introduction
Other Perfect-Fidelity Codecs
High-Quality Approximating Codecs


BitJazz
SheerVideo FAQ
Fidelity: High-Quality Approximating Codecs

Is SheerVideo more accurate than DV or DV-25?

Is SheerVideo more accurate than DV-50?

Is SheerVideo more accurate than DigiBeta?

Is SheerVideo more accurate than MPEG or DivX?

Is SheerVideo more accurate than Motion JPEG?

Is SheerVideo more accurate than Photo JPEG?

Is SheerVideo more accurate than Sorenson?

SheerVideoIs SheerVideo more accurate than Photo JPEG?

Yes. SheerVideo is a perfect-fidelity codec, while Photo JPEG is a DCT-based approximating codec. For real-world RGB 8b imagery, Apple's superb Photo JPEG codec at its Best quality setting has an RMS (root mean square) error of 0.70 b/S (bits per sample), whereas SheerVideo has 0.00 b/S error. For Y'CbCr 8bv, whether 4:4:4 or 4:2:2, Photo JPEG's RMS error is 0.38 b/S, against SheerVideo's 0.00 b/S error.

Despite its lower error rate, SheerVideo compresses 4 times as fast as Photo JPEG and decompresses 3 times as fast as Photo JPEG. Note also that SheerVideo supports alpha compression, which Photo JPEG does not. On the other hand, when quality and speed are less important, Photo JPEG can compress much further than any perfect-fidelity codec.

top | next

SheerVideoIs SheerVideo more accurate than Motion JPEG?

Yes. SheerVideo is a perfect-fidelity codec, whereas Motion JPEG is a DCT-based approximating codec. For real-world RGB 8b content, Apple's excellent Motion JPEG A and B codecs at their Best quality setting have an RMS (root mean square) error of 1.21 b/S (bits per sample), while SheerVideo has an error of 0.00 b/S. For Y'CbCr 8bv 4:4:4, Motion JPEG A and B's RMS error is 0.80 b/S, against SheerVideo's error of 0.00 b/S. Likewise, for Y'CbCr 8bv 4:2:2, M-JPEG A and B have an RMS error of 0.38 b/S, compared to SheerVideo's error of 0.00 b/S.

In spite of its lower error rate, SheerVideo compresses 3 times as fast as M-JPEG, and decompresses twice as fast as M-JPEG. Note also that SheerVideo supports alpha compression, which Motion JPEG does not. On the other hand, in situations where video file size is more important than quality and speed, Motion JPEG can compress far more than any perfect-fidelity codec.

previous | top | next

SheerVideoIs SheerVideo more accurate than DigiBeta?

Yes. SheerVideo is a perfect-fidelity codec, while Sony's Digital Betacam is a DCT-based approximating codec. The DigiBeta codec is not available in software, so we can't give you error statistics. But though DigiBeta is renowned for its low error rate, its error rate is certainly not zero. SheerVideo's error rate is zero.

Moreover, SheerVideo has a higher average compression power (2.20) than DigiBeta (2.00). And SheerVideo is available as a QuickTime codec for use in video applications. And SheerVideo also supports alpha compression, Y'CbCr[A] 8bv 4:4:4, RGB[A], and arbitrary resolution.

previous | top | next

SheerVideoIs SheerVideo more accurate than DV-50?

Yes. DV-50, also known as D9, Digital-S, or DVCPRO50, is an approximating codec, while SheerVideo is a perfect-fidelity codec. No DV-50 codec is currently available in software, so error statistics are unavailable. But DV-50 definitely has a non-zero error rate, whereas SheerVideo's error rate is zero.

Unlike DV-50, SheerVideo is available as a QuickTime codec for use in video applications. In addition, SheerVideo supports alpha compression, Y'CbCr[A] 8bv 4:4:4, and RGB[A], and arbitrary resolution.

previous | top | next

SheerVideoIs SheerVideo more accurate than DV or DV-25?

Yes. In contrast to SheerVideo, a perfect-fidelity codec with an error of 0.00 b/S (bits per sample), DV-25 is a DCT-based approximating codec that compresses by throwing away (hopefully) less-important information. Thus Apple's DV codec has an average error of 3.75 b/S (bits per sample) for Y'CbCr 8bv 4:2:2, and 2.48 b/S for RGB 8b.

For RGB 8b video, SheerVideo also compresses more than 5 times as fast as DV and decompresses nearly twice as fast as DV, and for Y'CbCr 8bv 4:2:2 video, SheerVideo compresses 8 times as fast as DV. Furthermore, in contrast to DV, SheerVideo supports alpha compression, Y'CbCr[A] 8bv 4:4:4, and RGB[A], and arbitrary resolution. On the other hand, DV is generally a more cost-effective solution for low-end standard-definition video production work.

previous | top | next

SheerVideoIs SheerVideo more accurate than MPEG or DivX?

Yes, but this isn't a fair question. SheerVideo, as a perfect-fidelity codec designed for production, interchange, and archival, has an error of 0.0 b/S (bits per sample). MPEG, which is designed for video distribution over low bandwidth channels, needs far higher compression than can be attained with perfect quality. The error rate for MPEG compression depends both on the degree of compression and on the particular implementation of the MPEG codec, of which there are many.

previous | top | next

SheerVideoIs SheerVideo more accurate than Sorenson?

Yes, but this isn't a very meaningful question. SheerVideo is a perfect-fidelity codec intended for use in production, interchange, and archival, where errors cannot be tolerated, and as such SheerVideo has an error of 0.0 b/S (bits per sample). Sorenson Video, in contrast, is an approximating codec designed for compressing video for low-bandwidth distribution. Sorenson's error rate naturally depends on how much you want to compress the data. At its maximum quality settings, Sorenson 3 has an average error of 1.7 b/S for real-world RGB 8b content.

Note that SheerVideo also compresses 20 times as fast (100 MiB/s on a 1-CPU 1 GHz Mac G4) as Sorenson 3 (5.5 MiB/s), and decompresses more than 4 times as fast (100 MiB/s) as Sorenson 3 (23 MiB/s) at maximum quality. And SheerVideo also supports alpha, unlike Sorenson. On the other hand, Sorenson Video can achieve far higher file-size reduction for distribution and other situations where quality and speed are not the primary concerns.

previous | top


previous pagenext page

Copyright © 2003..2011 BitJazz Inc. All rights reserved.
Site design by BitJazz Inc.